If anyone had any doubts that the Obama regime has any intention of letting us keep our guns...and the right to use them...this should clear things up.
Get your whistles and start running. It is now considered your DUTY to be a coward in the face of violence.
Greg Gutfeld is always very funny and typically insightful, but he missed on this one. Apparently Democrats WILL use children as props to protest their right to kill them.
Behold the little darlings holding protest signs defending
their mother's right to kill them.
Ponder, for a moment, the raging insanity of having your child hold up a sign protesting a bill that would limit abortion past 20 weeks. This child is PROTESTING against setting limits on his mommy's right to KILL him indiscriminately. These women are showing their moral courage and outrage at the idea that requiring them to figure out whether they want a child or not within the first FIVE MONTHS of pregnancy is anti-women.
It's anti-stupid, that's for sure.
You've got to be an utter moron to not have made up your mind about whether you want the child or not before 20 weeks have passed. There are guideposts, kittens. Markers, if you will.
First Marker: You decide to have sex. If you REALLY don't want children, don't have sex. As my brother, the scientist, likes to say, "No exposure. No risk."
Second Marker: You decide to have unprotected sex. If you REALLY don't want children, and being celibate isn't your thing, then at least use proper birth control. Remember that? That was supposed to make abortions rare. 56 million dead babies rare.
Third Marker: You realize you've missed your period and, knowing you had sex, figure you'd better discover whether you're pregnant or not. You then make the decision as to whether you want the "unexpected" pregnancy. Remember, kittens, this bill does not in any way restrict abortions in the first trimester. If you're going to do it, get after it. Waiting won't make things better, honey.
Fourth Marker: The marker of STUPIDITY. There does seem to be a lot of stupid to go around here, kittens. Apparently there are vast numbers of women who need to be protected against the tyranny of others who feel they should be just a trifle smarter and make this decision a tad sooner, before the "clump of cells" is indisputably a baby - a baby that can feel pain.
*****************************
The best thing about being a liberal Democrat is that you can vociferously protest for your right to be stupid selfish, stupid indecisive, stupid irresponsible, stupid immature, stupid promiscuous, and stupid stupid. And do it feeling supremely smart. Go figure.
The next best thing about being a liberal Democrat is that you can protest for whatever you want according to your momentary impulse. Everything is "for the children", unless it's for women who want to kill the children, then it's anti-woman if you're still for the children. Get it?
But these are also the main reasons I'm not a liberal Democrat. The stupidity is exhausting, and I simply find it impossible to stay up to date on what I am for and what I'm against and why. It's all too tiring.
Besides, of all the rights I've won as an American and a woman, the right to defend myself against someone who is almost certainly going to be bigger and stronger is the one right I refuse to give up.
I'll pay for my own birth control, thank you. And my own bullets.
That muddled response was overshadowed by Miss California, Leah Cecil whom responded to a pre-pageant question on ABC about her thoughts on euthanasia, “That’s a vaccine, right?”
That is right, sweetheart. It cures everything.
Of course, no post on the stupidity of beauty contestants is complete without revisiting that classic by Miss South Carolina:
I personally believe U.S. Americans are unable to do so because uuuh...some people out there in our nation don't have maps...but they have GUNS! So we're good. Somebody shoot something, will ya?
Well, kittens, with Obama now firmly stationed in the White House for his last four years, the REAL crazy can finally slip past the velvet ropes and show itself to all of America.
"But I don't HAVE $10.00, people!"
She became the face for the pro-abortion movement during the 2012 elections and the laughingstock of pro-lifers for her relentless push to force Americans to pay for her birth control. College student Sandra Fluke has been nominated as a potential Person of the Year by Time Magazine.
Fluke is apparently unable to figure out how to purchase low-cost birth control from places like Target, Wal-Mart or her local pharmacy. Still, Time magazine felt she was qualified enough to include her with legitimate newsmakers and leaders who are significantly more deserving of the award and recognition.
The End Times are nigh. December 21 can't get here soon enough.
At the bottom of the article is a place to VOTE NO on Sandra's candidacy for Person of the Year, and the heh heh! funny of the article catapults into HAHAHAHAHA!
“It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people
who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes
decide everything. --Joseph Stalin
Odd? Romney Got ZERO Votes In 59 Precincts in Philly, and 9 Precincts in Ohio
But what if there are parts of the country where Romney not only got
zero percent of the vote (a possibility in the case of vote totals so
small that rounding renders them null), but actually got literally zero
votes? For the nominee of a major party, that would be truly
extraordinary – so extraordinary, in fact, that it would strain
credulity.
And seeing as this highly unlikely turn of events happened not in one
or two precincts, but in over 59 in Philadelphia, and 9 in Cleveland,
that credulity can be safely said to be completely strained, if not
broken.
Yee-yaaahhhh...Okay. I'll buy that.
Look, everyone has their free phones and their free healthcare and their free education and women across the country can now safely get laid on a Friday night because they are FREE of you Republicans' restrictive, intolerant, backwards morality.
I, personally, am terrified every time the "radical" church ladies leave a Watchtower pamphlet at my door. They are planning to kill me, I just know it.
What isn't funny is that people as stupid as Rosie O'Donnell have a platform like The View on which to spout such nonsense and the audience (stupid squared) applaud. You can almost feel their congratulatory self-righteousness. I wouldn't be surprised if they shared satisfied glances among themselves as they furiously clapped their approval of such hideous stupidity, thinking themselves so very, very clever and intelligent and tolerant.
But while they smack their little hands together in support of equating "radical" Christianity with radical Islam, there are real women who know the difference. Because it kills them.
Wife and mother Randjida Khairi wanted her children to be essentially raised like all the other children in her adopted nation of Canada.
But for taking a stand contrary to her staunchly Islamic and Afghanistan-born husband, Peer Khairi, Randjida was found by Canadian police with her throat slashed wide-open, as well as her neck muscles, esophagus and voice box slashed open to the spine.
Unable to raise her head or scream for help, the victim slowly suffocated in her own blood.
According to testimony, "a process a pathologist would later determine took between five and 10 minutes."
Yes, kittens. Radical Christianity is as dangerous as radical Islam. Rosie O'Donnell said so.
It's Sunday and the sermon for today is, "How to Have Sex" by Andrew Klavan.
"What?" you ask with open-mouthed shock at the indelicacy of that title. "How can THAT be a Sunday sermon?"
Well, first because it happens to be Sunday and I want to post this. But second, and most important, sex is one of the most defining and important aspects of determining the shared moral values of society. So we all need a lecture about it once in a while. There are very few experiences in life that are virtually universal, that are as potentially powerful, and that have as many life-changing (both beginning and ending) consequences as sex. Try as we might, it is impossible to remove the moral component from sex. Can't be done. Sex is either moral or immoral; it is never neutral.
This video by Klavan was made three years ago, but it is more relevant now than ever. The recent Democratic National Convention put sex front and center with its WAR ON WOMEN campaign slogan. 30-something co-eds from prestigious universities pounded the podium and paraded before us all their right to have sex promiscuously and without consequence. Anything less constituted WAR!
But, as Mr. Klavan points out, there is no such thing as sex without consequence. To pretend otherwise leaves people broken, damaged and destroyed -- it's like being a Democrat!
I am not part of of this new America - this country where citizens no longer pledge their allegiance and honor to the ideas of liberty and justice for all but instead pledge their love and support to Obama in exchange for goodies and protections and privileges "for all". This is an America I do not recognize. This is an America that so disrespects its history and symbols that it allows a man who promised to uphold them to instead denigrate them.
Obama's flag. Not my flag.
Gone are the 50 stars representing the power of the individual states against the tyranny of a centralized, federal government. Now only one symbol is displayed.
For all. For Obama.
This is not my America. This is tyranny.
This America asks you to pledge your support for Obama and send in your request for whatever you want while you do it. What is it that you want from Obama? What gift? What privilege? What promise? Just ask. For Obama is all.
No longer is this a country of "we the people." Now we are a country of Obama's people.
For all. For Obama.
This is not my America. This is tyranny.
Free healthcare. Free education. Free respect.
You are no longer expected to earn anything.
Obama will provide "for all" for Obama IS all.
It's so cool.
As they pledge their allegiance to Obama, begging for goodies and treats, realize that--despite the smiles--they are demanding these things from you. Obama can not provide free healthcare or free education or even free respect. But he can make you provide it. And he will.
It is Sunday morning and I believe we should all pray for Chris Matthews to be healed. Even better - let's just pray for him to shut up.
In watching this I am left to wonder if it is possible to script a more illustrative exchange of what crazy looks like (without a wink to the "broad" parody). Here we have an adoring, sycophantic commentator make the charming statement that one of the greatest womanizing misogynists of the current political landscape would know how to even f*&k Martians, if he landed on Mars. Even on Mars, kittens, Bill Clinton would know how to "do it with them. He would know how to reproduce." He's just that good.
For Democrats, this is humanizing. Screwing aliens.
How coyly amusing and utterly beguiling! Isn't that exactly what we want in a president? Someone who would "instinctively" know how to screw other life forms? Of course we do. If we were all as nuts as Chris Matthews. (For my part, I'm just relieved a Democrat might want to screw someone other than an American citizen for once.)
How much clearer can the contrast be between the Democratic party which embraces such a man of instinct and the Republicans who would refuse a woman her God-given state-sponsored right to screw that man right here on terra firma, saving him the trip to Mars? Who better to stand as a symbol against the Republicans' vicious and barbaric War on Women than a man who so supports a woman's right to choose "yes", that he never once allowed a woman to choose "no"? Because that would have been a blantant denial of her power and recognition as a woman. And Bill Clinton has always recognized women. When one considers that he even managed to find a way for Monica Lewinsky to express her feminine power before she received free birth control from the government, we can only admire his deep commitment to the rights of women.
Thank you, Mr. Matthews, for so eloquently reminding us all of Mr. Clinton's most impressive characteristic.
Once there was a Democrat who believed with all her heart that the world should be a nice place. She wanted to live in a world where no one ever did anything bad and therefore no one ever experienced anything bad. A world where everyone would love one another and, just in case they didn't, a world where the government would be wise enough and kind enough and good enough and strong enough to make them love each other.
But because governments must inevitably be run by people, people who are likely to be as unwise and unkind and just plain icky as everyone else, people who are just as susceptible to greed and self-interest and corruption as those who elected them to thwart the greed and self-interest and corruption of those others who so desperately needed thwarting, it was decreed that all people elected to government would be instantly endowed with magical qualities of self-restraint, altruism, and moral imperturbability.
But the magic spell only worked on Democrats.
Everyone knew this. Everyone who was kind and decent and good and only wanted to love each other were Democrats.
It didn't work on Republicans.
They just made fun of everything. And they liked guns.
No matter how nice the Democrats were, no matter how tolerant or loving or generous, the Republicans were always angry, always trying to start a fight.
The Democrats did everything they could to get along with the Republicans, like burning the flag and marching in protests and sometimes breaking things, but only those things which belonged to nasty Republicans because then it wasn't unkind, it was instructive. Occasionally someone got carried away and tried to kill Republicans, but all the good Democrats insisted that they would not have done that if the Republicans weren't always so darned mean. And just to prove how mean the Republicans were, Republicans insisted that attempted murder was inexcusable and actually expected Democrats to get mad at the poor soul who just was trying to make a point.
But the Democrats never would because they knew that their higher moral ideals demanded understanding and sympathy for all those who struggled under the oppression of Republican bigotry. Getting angry at someone for trying to kill Republicans was narrow-minded and reactionary. However, the obvious over-reaction and anger from the Republicans at being murdered forced all good Democrats to be constantly aware of the inherent danger in the Republican viewpoint. A danger that could someday drive them to be violent. (Remember, they liked guns.)
So the world got nicer and nicer as the government got bigger and bigger and took care of more and more of the people, until one day the government said, "Hey, we're big enough now to give you LIFE! Or well....sort of."
And the good people, the Democrats, raised their arms and praised the heavens, knowing that their government was truly good, but the "sort of" part worried them a little. "What does that mean?" they asked.
"Well, it doesn't mean LIFE, exactly, it means more like we get to decide whether you live or die. And when."
"Oh," said the people, for this was a little less attractive than the whole giving LIFE idea.
"Yeah!" yelled all the Democrats. Because free is always good. And Republicans are always bad.
Then the nasty, mean, stingy, selfish stupid Republicans started asking questions and having "problems" with the idea of free stuff for everyone because they wanted people to die.
"How will we pay for this?" was the first stupid question and the Democrats knew they were just being selfish...and stupid....and selfish. And they were using math, which proved they had no hearts.
"The government will do it," they said over and over until they were blue in the face, but the Republicans never seemed to understand. The Republicans kept replying that the government was "us" and "we couldn't afford it" and stupid stuff like that.
Then the Republicans asked, "What if some of the choices you want to make regarding your health and this whole life and death thing are choices that I don't approve of? What then? Why should I be made to pay for what goes against my conscience?"
Then the good, kind Democrats knew that the Republicans were simply trying to be mean, mean, mean because everyone knows Republicans don't even HAVE a conscience.
"You just want to enslave women! This is a WAR ON WOMEN!!" the Democrats cried.
And the good, kind young Democrat girl heard the charges that the mean Republicans wanted to enslave her, to stop the government from helping her throughout her life with pretty much everything, and that they planned to throw her off a cliff when she became old, and she knew she would never vote for a Republican. She watched a slide show about another good, kind young Democrat named Julia, and she learned how wonderful and magical the world could be if only the Republicans would stop talking about conscience and money and stuff.
But if there was one place where the good, kind young Democrat believed that all decent people should agree, it was on the position of valuing life. Surely we could all find common ground on caring for others? she thought. Of course that didn't extend to a baby, let's just be clear on that. Everyone knew that denying women the right to decide with no restrictions at all when and why they would choose NOT to have a child, even if that choice was a trifle post-dated, was the same as enslavement and worse than the Taliban.
I am a baby. Aren't I a human being?
"Stay out of my body!" the young woman shouted righteously. "I have the right to do anything I wish. It's just a bunch of cells anyway!"
"So are you," replied the Republicans. "You're 'just a bunch of cells,' if you want to make that argument."
"No. We think they're nicer. And probably smarter."
Of course, Spongebob Squarepants was dancing with jelly fish years ago. He was a ground breaking scientist. And you thought I watched it because of the pictures and funny voices.
THE END (sort of...between Democrats and Republicans there's always more...)
I'v been linked at IMAO.US! Thanks, Harvey. You're a love.
Because it's not fair if any woman has to pay a DIME to f*&k around, even lovely and talented co-eds forking out over $40,000.00 for a year's tuition at Georgetown University. I mean....come oooon! $40k is a lot of money. Did you also expect Miss Fluke to come up with any extra cash to pay for her own basic healthcare and entertainment needs? Are you kidding me?
Like many co-eds today, Miss Fluke enjoys a full and rich educational experience at one of our nation's finest universities, which encompasses more than just studies, and that costs money, kittens. From her own testimony, around $1,000.00 per year for healthcare/entertainment. That's some seriously FULL and RICH experience. But, as parents, wewantour children to gain life experience at college, not just hit the books. Right? We want them to grow up and learn to be adults. Right? What better way than to have the government pick up all the costs of their playing house?
Riiiiiight.
Of course.
Here's the list of vitally necessary healthcare services now completely covered by the Obamacare mandate...errr...tax...aaahh...penalty...oh FFS...it's FREEEEE! And you worry about semantics? What are you, a conservative? Why do you care anyhow? You don't have sex. Shut up. Racist....I mean...misogynist. What the hell...you're undoubtedly both. Just shut up. We're all too busying f*&king around to listen to you anyway.
Well-woman visits.
Gestational diabetes screening that helps protect pregnant women from one of the most serious pregnancy-related diseases.
Domestic and interpersonal violence screening and counseling.
FDA-approved contraceptive methods, and contraceptive education and counseling.
Breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling.
HPV DNA testing, for women 30 or older.
Sexually transmitted infections counseling for sexually-active women.
HIV screening and counseling for sexually-active women.
#7! In America women need help breastfeeding. Do they need help in Botswana? Seems a
little embarrassing that we need counseling, support and SUPPLIES in this country.
But it's all just wonderful! I mean, all this time I thought women were fighting for RESPECT and it turns out they were fighting to be sluts. Respectable sluts, mind you. That's progress for you. And they were fighting for their basic right to be taken care of by the government. That's progress, too. Because we all know that decisions that involve self-denial or personal accountability are UNFAIR and deny people their RIGHTS. So now women are FREE to act any way they damn well want and the rest of us are free to pay for it, because it's not a mandate...or a penalty...or a tax...oh shut UP! I'm getting really tired of your bitching about the Constitution and all that ancient nonsense written by a bunch of old dead white guys. What did they know about women's health? See? Can't answer that, can you? Go away.
Anyway, now that's it all free...pool party at my house! YEAH!
Respectable slut Barbies exercising their rights.
And for you gentleman who can't get laid, even by sluts, Obama hasn't forgotten you. You can find your healthcare needs at Home Depot.
