Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Deja vu.


18 comments:

  1. She's not called the "Lizard Queen" for nothing.

    I've always thought of her as an evil bitch with no conscience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I always say her as the real lust for power behind Bill. Bill was a glad-handing, skirt-chasing, very smart good old boy who got serviced in the White House because, as he put it, "I could."

      Hillary, however, took the power VERY seriously. She stills thinks she can be the next POTUS.

      GOD! I hope she's wrong, but I'm losing faith in my fellow countrymen faster every single day.

      Delete
  2. This blog contains "fastidious" information? Is that even LEGAL?!"

    Love the photo. So stolen it will be, yes. Fastidiously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HAHAHAHA! I deleted the "spam". But you picked up on it before I could get rid of it...so now your brilliant comment is kind of hanging out there.

      Sorry! But yes, I do provide TONS of fastidious information. That's just the way I roll.

      HAHAHAHAAAAA!

      Delete
  3. That's what she's good at. That and mislaying records. If she's as sharp as a lot of people give her credit for, she'll have some evidence saved to show that she was following Obama's orders. She probably was, probably doesn't and isn't.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought the old "I vas followink orders" defense has been disallowed since the Nuremberg trials. However, considering what Hillary knows and how Obama and his slimy ilk have dealt with problems, if I were she, I'd stay out of Fort Marcy Park.

      Delete
    2. Nah, everybody knows the National Socialists were right-wing so that rule doesn't apply to the left.

      Delete
    3. The Clintons seriously HATE Obama, but they are all fellow travelers on the left and have made their peace with him. Hillary wants to be president and she thinks (and maybe she's right) that with the press covering O's ass with both hands and their lovely lips, that this will fade to black and all will be forgotten by the time 2016 rolls around.

      These are Democrats, remember. It could happen.

      Delete
    4. I don't think they've made their peace with him exactly. If they had the ability and their political calculation indicated that the best way to promote themselves was to destroy O they'd do it in a heartbeat. Hillary strikes me as the more ideological of the two but I think they're both Clintonists first and leftists second. More the traditional sleazy politicians we're used to.

      Delete
    5. Well, not "peace" in all's forgiven and they hug even in private. but "peace" in that they realize he is part of the power politburo and they have to deal with him. After the murder of Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs, they fell in line and have kept their mouths shut. The Clintons are no strangers to deaths under unusual or suspicious circumstances. They ran into someone who is better at it than they are.

      Delete
    6. Fancy you said that! Just an hour ago I left a comment on somebody's blog (on completely different topic), somehow arriving at Vincent Foster as one of the skeletons in the closet, along with Chinese deals and pardons, as examples of why Clintons, even on teh background of current gang, are not worthy of handshake

      Delete
  4. I can't even believe the way this story is unfolding, and how hard the press is trying to cover for their boyfriend.

    It has truly entered straight-up WTF territory, as DaveinTexas said on Ace's blog yesterday.

    Truly. I'm fucking speechless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm with you, Rachel. W. T. F. territory of mythic proportions.

      If Benghazi doesn't take down this regime, then nothing will. Even martial law and a total abandonment of the Constitution won't do it.

      I honestly think this is a final litmus test by Obama and Co. If they can beat Benghazi, they can do whatever they want. And they know it.

      Delete
    2. Rachel, OT:

      I can't find on your site or googling - can you point me to your old post about accusations in envy? As in: you criticized some idiot (who happened to be a female) and all the opponents can do instead of answering your arguments on merit is to explain the criticism by you, supposedly, being envious.

      Please? It was classic.

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Excellent. Yet again an example of how well-informed the readers of the NY Times and the watchers of the alphabet networks and the consumers of academia truly are.

      Frightening.

      Delete
  6. I've decided that anything that happens with this administration is like that Nickelodeon show It's All That, or something, with a sketch called Goodburger. The guy behind the counter shoves a milkshake to the customer with a sneaker sticking out of the cup. The customer says, "There's a shoe in my shake!" And the checkout guy says, "Uh. Nooo." And repeat. I used to think it was written for the Clintons. Now I think it's what's for dinner ad infinitum. For reals. Scarily. "Uh. No." And no one will do anything

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HAHAHAHA! I used to watch that show. KABLAM! and Invader Zim were also favs of mine. I actually own all the DVD's of Invader Zim. I know, I have the IQ and sense of humor of a slow 7th grader.

      But you're right. The lying isn't even skillful or interesting or inventive. Just, "Uh. No."

      And we are all supposed to shrug and go back to work.

      Delete