Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Apparently, liberals have finally demonstrated an understanding of how the marketplace actually works.

( mad blogging skillz are a little rusty, and I have seen fit to edit this blog post several times. So for anyone who jumped right on over and read this when it was first is different now. I fixed it. You're welcome.)


Supply and demand, bitches. Supply and demand.

The fact that with their favorite "non-profit", Planned Parenthood, the "supply" is illegally and ghoulishly harvested baby parts is a minor public relations issue, it would seem. Even for liberals, defiantly supporting such abhorrent actions is problematic, so websites like SNOPES jumped into action and decided that the allegations are UNDETERMINED.

Contradicting the notable SNOPES and its assessment of UNDETERMINED, CNN actually ran with the story just a couple of hours ago. Of course, they carefully presented it as if the damning evidence could be construed as maybe, perhaps, sorta, kinda UNDETERMINED as well, and therefore, we should all withhold know...until the whole thing blows over.

This cautionary stance of not leaping to judgment seems, however, to be a position which proves much more difficult for liberals when presented not with the bloody harvested body parts of fetuses, but with the juicy raw meat of Senator Cruz's new book, "A Time for Truth".  Why, THEN, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to hold your punches. UNDETERMINED, our collective asses!

Because THIS time, while the supply is neither illegal nor ghoulish nor intensely horrifying, it's worse. It is a bestselling book from a man who openly challenges liberal ideas while defending the wisdom and success of conservative ideas. And it gets worse. The man has a father who is -- HORRORS! -- a preacher! And -- unimaginably -- even worse! The man is a Tea Party hero.

So "The Time for Truth" is now, and the truth is Ted Cruz is a man who doesn't like liberals. I know...get outta here!

SHOCKED! I'm shocked, I tell you!

The good news is that his organs might be worth something.
This. Must. Not. Stand. Dead babies are just fodder for jokes, doncha know, but conservative arguments are completely outside the boundaries of civil society. But because of the obnoxious little thing called the 1st Amendment, at least for the time being liberals can't just outlaw his book. So they are doing the next best thing. Eliminating the demand. First, the New York Times ignored the book entirely, then they lied about it.  

Yet -- inexplicably -- the demon spawn's horrifying book is still SELLING!

Supply and demand, bitches. Supply and demand.

Did you say, "Shut up?"
You're going to have to speak up.
I can't hear you.

Senator Cruz, a man with a pointed and acerbic sense of humor, tweeted this:

So liberals have found themselves in the untenable position of being forced to acknowledge the hideous book and its loathsome author. In today's YAHOO! news, Jerry Adler's review of the previously invisible book makes the front page. He clearly struggles with the idea that anyone could actually dislike liberals for any reason other than being motivated by resentment or pettiness. So, of course, Mr. Adler writes about just how resentful and petty Cruz is. So you needn't waste your money on the book.

There is nothing UNDETERMINED about the review of Cruz's book.

Cruz’s biography is a tale etched in resentment. Most often, the villains are Democrats, reflecting a visceral dislike that was bred into him by the father he still idolizes — a father who refused for two years to call his son by the Americanized nickname he adopted (he was born Rafael Edward) because he shared it with a certain famous Democratic senator from Massachusetts. Later, he suffered at the hands of his freshman roommate at Princeton, a “liberal student from New Jersey” who expressed his contempt for the cowboy-boot-wearing Cruz by gluing shut the snooze button on Cruz’s alarm clock. Then there was a “fairly well-known liberal professor” who gave Cruz a B instead of the A he thought he deserved for a paper that compared private charity, favorably, to government welfare as a way to help the poor. “Was it ideological prejudice, or something else?” Cruz asks darkly, adding that the grade probably cost him the summa cum laude diploma he otherwise had earned.

And things only got worse at Harvard Law School, a hotbed of “trendy Marxist philosophy” and a bastion of affirmative action. His outspoken conservative views kept him from the presidency of the Harvard Law Review, and he had to settle for a senior editing post instead. But this apparent setback was not actually a failure, because “the election was not necessarily for the brightest among us, or the most accomplished, or the most articulate. None of us wanted someone like that getting the job and thus increasing his or her odds of getting a Supreme Court clerkship at our expense.” That should reassure any readers concerned that Barack Obama, who was president of the law journal, may have been smarter than Cruz.
(Emphasis all mine.)

OOOOOHHHH! That last part stung! And if our darling President Precious had ever allowed ANY college transcripts to be released, we might know the answer to that concern. As it is, we can just assume, according to Mr. Adler, that The Beloved is smarter than any right-wing, Bible-thumping, resentment-filled, woman-hating, sore-loser, scary-as-all-hell extremist.

You can take it on faith. Like the Iran deal.

In short:

Late-term living babies crushed with careful deliberation for their worth as dead babies. What's the big deal? I mean, other than insuring that the body parts are worth money.

A man who passionately believes in limited government and the freedom of the individual. OUTRAGEOUS!!!


  1. That baby harvesting story was grotesque. Not only what PP were doing, but that she was out in public casually talking about it, munching away on her lunch, as if it were nothing. Then the media downplays after trying to just ignore it. This society has gone way, way off the rails.

    I'm not reading any politician's biography, unless they're historical, but that review almost makes me want to.

    1. The video of her eating and drinking her red wine while casually discussing how to dismember and crush a baby so that she can "fill her orders" is beyond horrifying. It's like peeking into the days of Mengele. I couldn't bring myself to post the video here. It is too disturbing, even for me. As for Cruz's book. I don't expect I'll buy it. I like Cruz, but don't think he's suitable president material. He's too abrasive...not just to Democratic politicians, but to the American voter who is only barely interested in politics and has no high passion about much of any of it. And that's Mr. and Mrs. Majority. So, even though I believe Cruz is a good guy and tremendously smart, my money, for right now, is on Scott Walker. That's the guy who knows exactly how to face down the left. He doesn't get into pissing fights with them. He crushes their skulls under the wheels of his chariot. And simply drives on.

  2. After watching the left for many years I've developed a strong stomach, but watching that evil bitch discussing baby body parts over lunch was truly sickening.

    1. Morris, I'm with you. I am crying for my country...that we have come to this place where this kind of thing (remember Gosnell?) can and does happen...and no one will be prosecuted or stopped. It will continue without anyone even blinking.

  3. Yes, I'll third that. Watching her eat was like watching an ogre smacking its lips while gorily devouring the very body parts she was discussing.

    1. Julie...I truly believe that all the pretenses to man's ability to act morally without a belief in God are being gruesomely brought out into the light and shown for how brutally dishonest they are.

    2. Buttercup, you're so right. History shows that *every* time people and nations turn their back on God, disaster happens every time - the time taken for that to happen may vary but in the end it *does* happen.

  4. About the Cruz story: The NYT has been playing game for decades. So
    have book store chains and even individual stores. I have had to hunt for
    Ann Coulter books burried in Womens Studies and Dixie Lee Ray's anti-
    environmentalist book in the tree-hugger section. But the best thrill of
    all is the sneers I got from the clerks every time I bought a conservative
    book. It might explain why Bookstar is as dead as Generalismo Franco!

    1. Hi Unknown! Welcome. Not a great story to welcome you to the blog, though...I was going to include the GLOWING review the NYT gave Hillary's retarded bomb of a book, "Hard Choices", but the post got too long. I wanted to contract how incredibly sycophantic the Gray Lady is to the Pants Suit's utterly ridiculous that anyone in this country could possibly believe that the NYT is even TRYING to be unbiased.

    2. CONTRAST...not contract. One of these days I'm going to start proofing my comments. I. Swear. To. God!

  5. Cool. This is Leonard. The new tablet did not automatically post
    my name. From what I understand, the book written by the lesbian
    In the Mao Jacket bombed worse than a Kevin Costner movie! I
    have the same problem with proofreading, only I am dyslexic,
    I swear to Dog!

    1. HAHAHAHA! Like the dyslexic agnostic suffering from insomnia...up all night wondering if there really is a dog.

      The book by Granny Pantsuit was a disaster. You can tell how badly it did by how adoringly the liberals reviewed it. See, that way they are reinforcing how 'tarded us fly-over, barefoot baby factories are. We didn't buy it, not because it STUNK, but because we are just that stupid.